wizard Evaluation methodology selection wizard

Methodology finder – Fiscal and tariffs – Residential buildings

Available policy / sector / method combinations described in specific evaluation guides

  • Billing analysis [GUIDE 15]
    The billing analysis method requires energy meter readings (often from surveys) as input data which are used to calculate the gross energy saved. Corrections may be needed to calculate the net energy savings. In the case of dwellings the corrections needed are for the outside temperature, the occupancy and the behaviour of occupants. The method will provide the energy savings for a single dwelling, installation or piece of equipment.

Evaluation methodology comparison table

Evaluation method Pros & cons Method characteristics Required input data
  Pro Con Savings output Aggregation level Application (ex-ante/ex-post) Energy use before and after actions Number of energy saving actions Energy saved per action Normalisation factors Gross-to-net adjustments
Billing analysis Easy Too aggregated Unitary, participant Bottom-up and top-down Ex-post only For each participant By complementary method No, follows from method For behaviour, temperature E.g. free riders (in case of subsidies)
Deemed savings
Fallback methodology: financial incentive / residential / deemed savings [GUIDE 9]
Cheap Imprecise Unitary, mostly system Bottom-up Ex-ante and ex-post No (covered in savings) By complementary method To be estimated No (covered in method) E.g. free riders (in case of subsidies)
Stock modelling
Fallback methodology: financial incentives / residential / stock modelling [GUIDE 10]
Easy calculation A lot of data needed Number of actions Bottom-up Ex-ante and ex-post No (see deemed savings as complementary method) From method (stock/market data > replaced equipment) Yes, from complementary method See deemed savings as complementary method E.g. free riders (in number of actions)
Diffusion indicator
Fallback methodology: financial incentives / residential / diffusion indicator
[GUIDE 11]
Easy Only for uniform systems Number of actions Bottom-up Ex-post only No (see deemed savings as complementary method) From penetration rate per year Yes, from complementary method See deemed savings as complementary method E.g. free riders (in number of actions)
Econometric modelling
Fallback methodology: fiscal / all sectors / econometric modelling [GUIDE 21]
Explanation of relations Possibly missing factors Total savings Top-down Ex-post only For (sub)sector Depends on case Depends on case For behaviour, temperature, activity level No (if covered in method)
Econometric –  Price elasticity
Fallback methodology: fiscal / all sectors / econometric price elasticity [GUIDE 22]
Simple (only price) Situation dependent Total savings Top-down Ex-ante and ex-post For (sub)sector No (included in total savings) No (included in total savings) No (method on normalised case) E.g. double counting